<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>K3RNEL &#187; Parsers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://k3rnel.net/category/parsers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://k3rnel.net</link>
	<description>Powered by Lovelocks and Pwnies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 17:50:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comparing XML Parsers: DOM vs Pull vs SAX</title>
		<link>http://k3rnel.net/2010/06/18/comparing-xml-parsers-dom-vs-pull-vs-sax/</link>
		<comments>http://k3rnel.net/2010/06/18/comparing-xml-parsers-dom-vs-pull-vs-sax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 04:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nushio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Parsers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abugadro.k3rnel.net/?p=25</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Long story short? SAX is faster. There, you don&#8217;t have to read the article. Since it&#8217;s no secret that fetching Issues from Launchpad, Google Code and Bugzilla involves parsing RSS/ATOM feeds, I decided to poke around and investigate which parser to use and the advantages each carried. After a few seconds of Googling, I found [...]<p class="read-more"><a href="http://k3rnel.net/2010/06/18/comparing-xml-parsers-dom-vs-pull-vs-sax/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://k3rnel.net/2010/06/18/comparing-xml-parsers-dom-vs-pull-vs-sax/" title="Comparing XML Parsers: DOM vs Pull vs SAX"></a><p>Long story short? SAX is faster. There, you don&#8217;t have to read the article.</p>
<p>Since it&#8217;s no secret that fetching Issues from Launchpad, Google Code and Bugzilla involves parsing RSS/ATOM feeds, I decided to poke around and investigate which parser to use and the advantages each carried.</p>
<p>After a few seconds of Googling, I found <a href="http://www.developer.com/ws/article.php/3824221/Android-XML-Parser-Performance.htm">this</a> article, over at <a href="http://www.developer.com/">Developer.com</a>. Their math seems solid. I&#8217;m sticking to SAX.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://k3rnel.net/2010/06/18/comparing-xml-parsers-dom-vs-pull-vs-sax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

